RE: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?

["Brent Fulgham" <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com>]

Feel free to use the Schematics CVS to store the info.

-Brent

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Peake [mailto:apeake@comac.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:16 AM
> To: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
> Subject: RE: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
> 
> 
> I would be willing to help.
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
> [mailto:owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu]On Behalf Of Shriram
> Krishnamurthi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:45 AM
> To: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
> Subject: Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
> 
> 
> Chris: great point.  I recall at least two different people telling me
> they were preparing code, but I guess they didn't follow-up.
> 
> Shriram
> 
> Chris Uzdavinis wrote:
> 
> > Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu> writes:
> > 
> > > I don't know if you folks have heard this, but MzScheme has a
> > > lightening fast interpreter; it even beats some compiled code!
> > > 
> > > Shriram
> > 
> > Has anyone considered preparing code for the "the great computer
> > language shootout"?  http://www.bagley.org/~doug/shootout/
> > 
> > It's not very scientific, but a lot of people look at that 
> site and it
> > could "get the word out" if mzScheme does well.  Some other scheme
> > implementations like bigloo have good showings.
> > 
> > (I hope suggesting this isn't offensive to anyone.)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Chris
> > 
> > 
> 
>