[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?

To: kragen@pobox.com (Kragen Sitaker)
Subject: Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
From: sperber@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor])
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:58:11 +0100
Cc: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020321072226.8A969BDC5@panacea.canonical.org> (kragen@pobox.com'smessage of "Thu, 21 Mar 2002 02:22:26 -0500 (EST)")
References: <20020321072226.8A969BDC5@panacea.canonical.org>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo,i386-unknown-freebsd4.3)

>>>>> "Kragen" == Kragen Sitaker <kragen@pobox.com> writes:

Kragen> Brent Fulgham writes:
>> I find myself in an uncomfortable state of language equivocation.  I
>> seem to be forever vascillating between the strongly-typed and
>> "dynamic/untyped" programming languages.

Kragen> Scheme and OCaml are strongly typed;

Scheme *as a language*?  No.

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>

References:
- Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
  - From: kragen@pobox.com (Kragen Sitaker)

Prev by Date: Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
Next by Date: Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
Prev by thread: Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
Next by thread: Re: Strong Typing, Dynamic Languages, What to do?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread