[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: a new port of oleg's ssax xml parser to plt

To: <plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu>
Subject: RE: a new port of oleg's ssax xml parser to plt
From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 14:03:40 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <BE6EE24E3C118B4CAF54769CDA66F361A1EC45@ivory.corp.xpsystems.com>
References: <BE6EE24E3C118B4CAF54769CDA66F361A1EC45@ivory.corp.xpsystems.com>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

Brent Fulgham wrote:

> What benefit is there to continuing the "lxml" collection?  
> [Summary: don't.]

I am rapidly approaching the same conclusion.  We need to figure out
backward-compatibility issues.

Shriram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: a new port of oleg's ssax xml parser to plt
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

References:
- RE: a new port of oleg's ssax xml parser to plt
  - From: "Brent Fulgham" <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com>

Prev by Date: RE: a new port of oleg's ssax xml parser to plt
Next by Date: Re: Macros: One expression => more than one expression?
Prev by thread: RE: a new port of oleg's ssax xml parser to plt
Next by thread: Re: a new port of oleg's ssax xml parser to plt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread