[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scsh in PLT Scheme?
--- Paul Steckler <steck@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> So before we embark on that course, let me poll the
> PLT audience:
>
> - do you currently use scsh?
Yes
> - what features of scsh do you use?
Text processing (awk etc.), process control
> - what features of scsh do you consider
> indispensable?
The above
> - what features of scsh do you consider
> peripheral?
The rest.
> - would you find scsh-under-PLT-Scheme useful?
Yes, it's a pain going Scheme48 <---> MzScheme
> - would you use a PLT scsh-oid that implemented
> some, but not all of
> scsh?
Yes
> - string manipulations (Ch. 5)
> - regexps (Ch. 6)
> - AWK-in-Scheme (Ch. 8)
My fellow Schematicians have ported SRFI 13 and 14 to
PLT Scheme (CVS, srfi/) which puts you a long way
towards supporting the text processing stuff. There
is also a semi-port of some of the text processing
stuff (CVS, data/). The main funkiness is the
Scheme48 macros (let-optional, receive) that are used
extensively in the code. We have implementations of
them (srfi/optional.ss) but it is probably more
efficient to replace them with their PLT equivalents
(case-lambda etc.)
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://movies.yahoo.com/