RE: "indexed" COM properties in MysterX?

["Paul Steckler" <steck@ccs.neu.edu>]

> > Shriram Krishnamurthi suggested once that we make COM objects behave
> > just like MzScheme objects.  While that's probably possible
> technically,
> > I'm not sure the extra complication is worthwhile.
> 
> I tried this with CLOS objects on common lisp (corman lisp, not ACL).
> IMHO it's worth because you get the object hierarchy and their
> documentation
> for free.
> For users it's no complication. I consider it a huge simplification.

Exactly what did you do?  Does this mean you wrote the support to turn
COM objects into CLOS objects?

If so, how did you handle COM methods that return COM objects?

-- Paul