Re: Hard of thinking using schemeql

[Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>]

We could answer all these questions (well, most of them!), but let me
make a suggestion.  What you're looking at is the Old World of v103.
In the new world (v200, or v199.xx in pre-release) is a lot, lot
cleaner and nicer.  Why don't you try that out?  

For instance, consider the URL library: there's just

url.ss -- provides the URL module
          [what you normally want]
url-sig.ss -- specifies the URL module interface, to use elsewhere
              [the ".h" file]
url-unit.ss -- implements the URL module 
               [the ".c" file; ignore this!]

There's no (explicit) use of the macro library anywhere.  And so
forth.

Shriram