[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Maybe a small bug?

To: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>
Subject: Re: Maybe a small bug?
From: Matthew Flatt <mflatt@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 08:54:34 -0700 (MST)
CC: <plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu>
In-Reply-To: <001b01c067fd$0c0eb090$0100007f@cradle>
References: <001b01c067fd$0c0eb090$0100007f@cradle>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

Quoting "Ji-Yong D. Chung":
>     In any case, according to R4RS and R5RS, 
> I should not be able to redefine syntactic keywords.

I belive you are correct for R4RS, but see the "Clarifications and
Corrections" to R5RS. It clarifies that keywords are not reserved, and
"a program may redefine any or all syntactic keywords".

Matthew

References:
- Maybe a small bug?
  - From: "Ji-Yong D. Chung" <virtualcyber@erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: minor readline bug?
Next by Date: Re: Swig and MzScheme's _scheme_get_type_name
Prev by thread: Maybe a small bug?
Next by thread: mcmicmac & zodiac
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread