[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MzScheme vs MIT Scheme

To: plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu
Subject: Re: MzScheme vs MIT Scheme
From: Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@mclink.it>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 20:34:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3900E2C8.FE2490C4@earthling.net>
Organization: Paolo Amoroso - Milan, ITALY
References: <3900E2C8.FE2490C4@earthling.net>
Sender: owner-plt-scheme@fast.cs.utah.edu

On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:22:48 -0400, J. Reeves Hall <reeves@earthling.net>
wrote:

> One last issue... DrScheme seems to use an exhorbitant amount of memory,
> and makes my entire system (dual PII running Linux) run slowly. I have
> 128MB, so this shouldn't be happening. Any ideas?

DrScheme has acceptable--if not good--performance on my old Pentium 200 box
with 64M of RAM running Red Hat Linux 5.2.


Paolo
-- 
EncyCMUCLopedia * Extensive collection of CMU Common Lisp documentation
http://cvs2.cons.org:8000/cmucl/doc/EncyCMUCLopedia/

References:
- MzScheme vs MIT Scheme
  - From: "J. Reeves Hall" <reeves@earthling.net>

Prev by Date: MzScheme vs MIT Scheme
Next by Date: Re: MzScheme vs MIT Scheme
Prev by thread: MzScheme vs MIT Scheme
Next by thread: Re: MzScheme vs MIT Scheme
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread