[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ANTS on Linux performance...

To: Timothy Stack <stack@cs.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: ANTS on Linux performance...
From: adotl <adotl@lion.cc>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:20:01 +0200
Cc: janos-discuss@fast.cs.utah.edu
In-Reply-To: <200109201619.f8KGJ2g00858@faith.cs.utah.edu>
References: <200109201619.f8KGJ2g00858@faith.cs.utah.edu>
Sender: owner-janos-discuss@fast.cs.utah.edu

On Thursday 20 September 2001 18:19, you wrote:

>
> Its been awhile since I've looked at performance, but ANTS is really
> pretty slow so its not surprising...
>

Well, I've seen measurements of 20~30 Mbit/s sending
capacity...

Is it possible that those results were obtained with the old 
ANTS (from univ. Washington) and that ANTSR (ANTS2) performs this much 
worse ??

cheers

Andreas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ANTS on Linux performance...
  - From: Timothy Stack <stack@cs.utah.edu>

References:
- Re: ANTS on Linux performance...
  - From: Timothy Stack <stack@cs.utah.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: Re[2]: Starting ANTS apps over Linux on different PCs
Next by Date: curiosity
Prev by thread: Re: ANTS on Linux performance...
Next by thread: Re: ANTS on Linux performance...

[ Janos ] [ OSKit ] [ Network Testbed ] [ Flick ] [ Fluke ]
Flux Research Group / Department of Computer Science / University of Utah