[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NodeOS questions

To: lindell@ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: NodeOS questions
From: Steve Schwab <schwab@tislabs.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 11:37:30 -0800 (PST)
CC: activenets_nodeos@ittc.ukans.edu, janos-discuss@fast.cs.utah.edu
In-reply-to: <200003101751.JAA00445@boreas.isi.edu> (message from Bob Lindellon Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:51:33 -0800)
Reply-to: schwab@tislabs.com
Sender: owner-janos-discuss@fast.cs.utah.edu

>2) Is porting to the Janos Java bindings the right goal?
>
>Our goal is to port our EE to the NodeOS interface.  This should
>make it easier for others to experiment with our EE on a real NodeOS
>implementation.  Does a port using the Janos Java bindings achieve this
>goal?  Do most NodeOS developers plan to use the Janos Java bindings
>and port the backend to their respective NodeOS implementations?  If the
>answer is no, what Java bindings should we be using.

The AMP project is going ahead and using the Janos Java bindings, although
we will likely find that some minor changes are needed as we implement the
glue-code to tie the Java binds down to the nodeOS implementations written
in C.

--Steve

References:
- NodeOS questions
  - From: Bob Lindell <lindell@ISI.EDU>

Prev by Date: NodeOS questions
Next by Date: Re: NodeOS questions
Prev by thread: NodeOS questions
Next by thread: Re: NodeOS questions

[ Janos ] [ OSKit ] [ Network Testbed ] [ Flick ] [ Fluke ]
Flux Research Group / Department of Computer Science / University of Utah