Paper Title:

Reviewer Name:

Brief Summary of Paper:



Please rate the paper on the 8 dimensions listed below, according to
the proposed scale running from 1 to 5, where 1 means "poor" and 5
means "excellent". Please use only the listed numbers. After each
"vote", write a few sentences giving the reasons for your rating.


Correctness: Does the paper appear to be flawed technically and/or
          methodologically?
        5: Impeccable
        4: The paper is OK
        3: Only trivial flaws
        2: Minor flaws that must be corrected
        1: Major flaws that make the paper unsound/inconsistent

My vote:
Explanation:


Implications: How important is the work?
        5: Will change the future
        4: People will read and cite this paper
        3: Restricted interest
        2: Not of compelling interest
        1: Will have no impact on the field

My vote:
Explanation:


Originality: How novel is the approach?
        5: A radically new approach
        4: An innovative use
        3: A new application of well known techniques
        2: Yet another application of well worn techniques
        1: Entirely derivative

My vote:
Explanation:


Empirical Grounding: Does this paper contain information about evaluation?
        5: Excellent evaluation
        4: Good evaluation
        3: Some evaluation
        2: Evaluation is weak
        1: Should have contained some evaluation, but it didn't;
           or it did but the evaluation was bogus
      N/A: Does not apply

My vote:
Explanation:


Clarity: Is it clear what was done?
        5: Presentation is very clear
        4: Difficult, but understandable
        3: Some parts were not clear to me
        2: Most of the paper is unclear
        1: Presentation is very confusing

My vote:
Explanation:


References: Is the bibliography relevant and exhaustive?
        5: Thorough
        4: Pretty good, but a few missing
        3: Some citations, but some missing
        2: Scrappy citations; a lot missing
        1: Virtually no relevant references cited

My vote:
Explanation:


Out or In: Should the paper be rejected or accepted?
        5: I would fight to have this paper accepted
        4: I would like this paper accepted
        3: I am undecided
        2: I would like this paper rejected
        1: I would fight to have this paper rejected

My vote:
Explanation: